ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

UK universities¡¯ Gaza ceasefire silence ¡®seems hypocritical¡¯

<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="standfirst">Adam Habib says institutions that spoke out over Ukraine ¡®immediately invoked institutional neutrality¡¯ on Gaza, questioning whether they would have done the same in relation to Nazi Germany
March 21, 2024
Adam Habib, director of SOAS University of London
Source: University of the Witwatersrand

UK universities that have not called for a ceasefire in the Israel-Gaza war must explain how that is consistent with their foundational democratic values, according to a sector leader.

Adam Habib,?vice-chancellor?of SOAS University of London, said many universities, along with umbrella body Universities UK (UUK), spoke out publicly during the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement and Russia¡¯s invasion of Ukraine ¨C but then ¡°immediately invoked institutional neutrality¡± when it came to Israel¡¯s attacks on civilians in Gaza.

Speaking during a conference on academic freedom at the University of Cambridge, he said: ¡°For many this has created the perception of deep, deep hypocrisy and frankly racism amongst people in universities in the UK, and in universities in the global south.¡±

SOAS called for an immediate end to attacks on university students, staff and buildings late last year, as did the University of Glasgow. However, they remain the only two institutions to have done so, according to Professor Habib.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

¡°In a country of 160 public universities, in a war where 32,000 people have died in the space of four months, in a context where 16,000 children have died, only two universities ¨C all of whom profess to the liberal values of a democracy ¨C have come out in favour of a ceasefire,¡± he said.

Professor Habib said his views ran contrary to the mainstream view of other vice-chancellors and that of Arif Ahmed, director for freedom of speech and academic freedom of the Office for Students, that universities are neutral.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

Their argument is that institutional neutrality is the gateway to intellectual plurality, he said. But the former vice-chancellor of the University of the Witwatersrand said he did not buy this view, arguing that these leaders have forgotten the implicit values enshrined in their universities.

Although it is ¡°symbolic¡±, he said SOAS supports a ceasefire because it is committed to liberal values, committed to the values of social justice, and committed to certain rights.

¡°There¡¯s a very clear right in the genocide convention, in the declaration of human rights, in the?rules of law that civilians should not be targeted in attacks.

¡°That value, that right¡­is being violated and in that context, you have to call for a ceasefire.¡±

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

Delivering the keynote address at the conference organised by the Research for Equitable Access and Learning Centre and the Centre for Lebanese Studies, Professor Habib questioned whether those that?have not called for a ceasefire would have done the same in relation to Nazi Germany or apartheid-era South Africa.

He said he was not advocating for all UK universities to call for a ceasefire, but said that they must publicly justify how they square their societal values with the decision not to.

¡°If you say you made a mistake before then admit it publicly¡­not quietly to me as some have done, so you can be held publicly accountable,¡± he said.

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Related articles
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Related universities
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Reader's comments (5)
In fact, most academics were long silent about the rise of Nazis and other fascists and the Holocaust. Such comparisons must be based on historical knowledge, not false analogies. The evidence is easy to access.
If UK universities call for a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war, then they should also call for the release of the hostages still held by Hamas. A terrorist organisation keeping civilians, including children, elderly and ill people in captivity in awful conditions for months is clearly against the liberal values invoked by professor Habib. Why should UK universities take a side? Not to mention that the release of hostages would also be the best way to negotiate a ceasefire.
There is clear-cut right and wrong in Black Lives Matter. Of course they do! There is clear-cut right and wrong in the invasion of Ukraine by Russia. The sad state of affairs in Gaza are not clear cut. Hamas committed a devastating act of terrorism, which provoked Israel into an over-reaction. Both are guilty of atrocities. Both need to hang their heads in shame. Yes, there needs to be a ceasefire and humanitarian aid should be allowed into Gaza in unlimited quantaties, but the remaining Israeli hostages also need to be returned to their loved ones. Ideally the criminals responsible for the kidnapping should be brought to justice... but last time a criminal was on the run in the town where I live, the authorities didn't carpetbomb the entire town in the hopes of maybe killing them or even catching them as they fled.
Drawing a parallel between Black Lives Matter and the Israeli-Hamas war is a false equivalence but I would expect as much from a man who has publicly perpetuated anti-Blackness while in post as VC of SOAS. Habib does not have the moral authority to lecture anyone on racism. I question why he is still in post. Some of us have not forgotten.
Thank you Adam Habib for pointing out the inconsistency. The attack by Hamas cannot be condoned but neither can the disproportionate response, the deaths of over 14000 children and the violation of international laws be ignored.
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Sponsored
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Featured jobs