榴莲视频

Fishy tale about pay 2

<榴莲视频 class="standfirst">
十月 4, 2002

Your article "More staff earn ?50K-plus" ( THES , September ) could be taken to imply, incorrectly, that Southampton Institute has made generous pension "top-ups" to staff taking early retirement, outside Higher Education Funding Council for England guidance.

In line with that guidance, the figures include redundancy payments and a charge levied by our two pension funds (Teachers Pensions and the Local Government Superannuation Scheme) to meet the costs of triggering pensions early.

At the institute, the early release of pensions with redundancy is mandatory for non-academic staff under the local government scheme. To maintain equity, the institute chooses to allow early triggering of pensions for academic staff. There is no question of enhancing staff pension entitlements.

One needs only to refer to the institute's small number of ?50K-plus "earnings" (which includes these pension fund charges), compared with much greater numbers in many other institutions, both large and small, to see that the "big bucks", if they exist in higher education, are not located here.

Roger Brown
Principal, Southampton Institute

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.