榴莲视频

Oversight is essential (2 of 2)

<榴莲视频 class="standfirst">
十月 6, 2011

"Bleak vision for student imports due to lack of 'oversight'" provided a much-needed focus on the damage caused to UK further and higher education by recent changes to the student-immigration route. But still to be addressed is the UK's lack of a comprehensive quality-assurance system for private further and higher education. Although private colleges that wish to recruit international students must achieve "educational oversight", the process is split between several bodies, and the impetus for the system originates from the 榴莲视频 Office.

Furthermore, a college that decides not to recruit internationally has no requirement to submit to a quality assurance-focused review at all. Where is the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills in all this?

David Willetts, the universities and science minister, has talked repeatedly about "opening the market to new entrants", yet BIS has failed to take responsibility for providing a comprehensive system to assure quality and has allowed the 榴莲视频 Office to wreak havoc on high-quality, reputable education providers. This lack of joined-up thinking may mean that there are no "new entrants" to help boost the academy, and a diverse and innovative sector may be stifled at a time of potential growth.

Gina Hobson, Chief executive, British Accreditation Council

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.