榴莲视频

Running battles on the governance front line 3

<榴莲视频 class="standfirst">
九月 17, 2009

The letter from a group of 185 academics concerned about the way "voluntary" redundancies appear to be "engineered" raises an important point (Letters, 10 September). In the voluntary casework I do, I have noticed an increasing number of similar cases recently.

One has sympathy for the dire straits in which higher education institutions find themselves in financially uncertain times. However, human resources departments should not forget that academic and academic-related staff in pre-1992 universities still enjoy the protection of the Model Statute created under Section 202 of the Education Reform Act 1988.

Many institutions have "updated" its provisions and some have sought to create a simpler and speedier route to redundancy than it intended, especially in the case of academic-related staff. But it is still in place, barring the path to the arbitrary removal of protected employees in "managerial interests".

It would be timely to see a Times Higher Education review of prevailing redundancy practices that undermine Model Statute protections.

G.R. Evans, Oxford.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.