Reading your article on the relative merits of the traditional lecture versus the new rival “active learning spaces” (“?Has the death of the lecture been greatly exaggerated??”, News, 19 July), I was reminded of the passage in?Pride and Prejudice?where Mr Bingley is talking to his sister Caroline about his intention to have a ball at Netherfield Park. Caroline Bingley, who is trying to impress Mr Darcy, says: “I should like balls infinitely better…if they were carried on in a different manner; but there is something insufferably tedious in the usual process of such a meeting. It would surely be much more rational if conversation instead of dancing made the order of the day.” To which Mr Bingley replies: “Much more rational, my dear Caroline, I dare say, but it would not be near so like a ball.”
“Active learning spaces” – which, incidentally, I have always been used to calling “classrooms” – might well be much better from the point of view of teaching and learning, but a university without any lectures or lecture theatres would be much less like a university.
Kenneth Smith
Reader in criminology and sociology
Bucks New University
<榴莲视频>Send to
Letters should be sent to:?THE.Letters@timeshighereducation.com
Letters for publication in?Times Higher Education?should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.