榴莲视频

‘Mixed messages’ on face coverings on?campus ‘harm compliance’

<榴莲视频 class="standfirst">Crowdsourced data suggest some institutions have toned down their rules on masks in recent months
十月 11, 2021
Workmen adjusting diversion arrows signs to illustrate ‘Mixed messages’ on face coverings on campus ‘harms compliance’
Source: Getty

The wide variation in policies on wearing face coverings across UK universities sends “mixed messages” to students and risks harming compliance, an academic has warned.

A compiled by academics across the country reveals that only 20 out of the 91 institutions listed will require the wearing of?masks in all teaching spaces, with a?further 19 stating that it?is “expected”.

Twelve of the institutions mandating masks are in Scotland, where the Holyrood government has made their use on campus a?legal requirement.

Among institutions not mandating masks, some say that their use is “encouraged”, while others say it is a matter of “personal” choice. There is also significant variation in whether universities ask students to wear masks when moving around campus buildings.

The spreadsheet was created by Andrew Chitty, until recently a senior lecturer in philosophy at the University of Sussex, who highlighted that there were a number of cases in which universities gave different guidance on different pages of their websites.

“Overall, there is absolutely no consistency across the sector in the UK,” Dr Chitty said.

Simon Williams, senior lecturer in people and organisation at Swansea University, said, “when you have such mixed messages, it?harms buy-in”.

“When there are such different approaches and policies across institutions, it just gets confusing for people. If a student in one university realises their friends in another don’t have to wear masks, it makes them question the need,” he said.

Since Times Higher Education conducted its own survey of 65 universities this summer, some appeared to have relaxed their rules. The University of Bolton had stated that masks were mandatory on campus, but it now says “social distancing and face coverings now [are] NOT mandatory, but we hope you will choose to wear them”.

The University of East Anglia has toned down its policy’s language, from “required” to “strongly encouraged”.

The Independent Sage group of scientists “universities to go beyond current government recommendations” and make the use of?face coverings in communal study and workspaces a?requirement, in a bid to stop the spread of coronavirus.

“No one particularly likes wearing masks, but it is less of a sacrifice than other preventive measures, such as lockdowns,” Dr Williams said. “It’s also important to put it into a global perspective; in the US, for example, many institutions have vaccine mandates.”

Dr Chitty created a that found that only 18 universities so far have said that they are using carbon dioxide monitors to check on the adequacy of their buildings’ ventilation, and just five have publicly adopted benchmark carbon dioxide levels.

The data emerge amid continuing concern that the return to face-to-face teaching will drive a spike in Covid-19 cases in university communities.

“Some universities are sending a strong and consistent message on wearing face coverings and are implementing a systematic and transparent programme of ventilation checking,” Dr Chitty said.

“But many others are doing neither, to the point where it is hard to see that they are fulfilling their legal duty under the Health and Safety Act 1974 to?ensure as far as is ‘reasonably practicable’ the health, safety and welfare of their staff and students.”

anna.mckie@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
<榴莲视频 class="pane-title"> 相关文章
<榴莲视频 class="pane-title"> Reader's comments (4)
Here's the nub of it: “Some universities are sending a strong and consistent message on wearing face coverings and are implementing a systematic and transparent programme of ventilation checking,” Dr Chitty said. “But many others are doing neither, to the point where it is hard to see that they are fulfilling their legal duty under the Health and Safety Act 1974 to ensure as far as is ‘reasonably practicable’ the health, safety and welfare of their staff and students.” Simple fact: An Employer (any employer, any job) have a responsibility to provide a safe workplace. University Teaching is no different. Do I feel safe at work? Heck no.
I have no worries about being on campus and have elected to do some face-to-face teaching. Personally, I would remove all requirements to observe any restrictions since these no longer apply in pubs and so on, where students can mix freely.
Classrooms are not pubs, we have no immediate choice about whether to be there, our students expect us to keep them safe and universities have a legal obligation to keep their employees safe. If someone you know dies as a result of gross incompetence on the part of university senior management push for a criminal investigation - institutional liability or even personal criminal liability. A selection of vice-chancellors or other senior managers answering for their decisions in a criminal court should at least focus minds for next time: https://www.vanderpumpandsykes.co.uk/site/library/employment/corporate_manslaughter_and_gross_negligence_manslaughter.html
Sorry to disappoint you all. It is quite clear the government does not care, you cannot enforce face coverings on students. You can either opt to wear one or not wear one yourself. The university management teams pretend to care but do not really. They do not want you to catch covid as that means potentially giving your work to someone else while you try to recover. Thats it no more lockdowns as the government has given up and cannot afford them...stay safe but it up to you to minimize your own risk and get jabbed is part of it.