In 2007, a book made waves in Germany by alleging that academics commonly get up to all sorts of unethical behaviour, including delegating their assigned teaching to others, rather than doing it themselves.

Much has changed in German academia since the , whose allusive title roughly translates as Professor Misdeed: What is rotten behind the scenes at universities, was published, but the delegation of classes to doctoral students still occurs. It is certainly not unusual for PhD students ¨C who are reliant on the professor¡¯s patronage ¨C to prepare lectures, set and mark exams, and even accompany the professor to the lecture hall to ensure that the technical side runs smoothly when he or she presents the material. Some might even be asked to deliver the lectures themselves.

A case in point is that of well-known virologist Alexander Kekul¨¦, whose 2021 suspension by the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg for neglecting his teaching was recently deemed by the of Saxony-Anhalt.

Kekul¨¦, who was director of the university¡¯s Institute for Medical Microbiology, became a familiar face during the for his early warning about the dangers of not addressing it and his criticisms of politicians and scientists who played down its seriousness.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

However, according to reports, it was also precisely during this period that he neglected his teaching duties. In the 2020 summer semester, the university claims, he delegated his teaching, while during the 2020-21 winter semester, he allegedly did not deliver his digital lectures live, as was required, and only made his slides available after the end of the lecture period.

Kekul¨¦ has not been allowed to teach or research at the university since : a common procedure, according to reports, when it is expected that removal from civil service status (which all German academics enjoy) will be announced?after the formal disciplinary proceedings. Since April 2022, he has also had 20 per cent of his salary docked, and is likely to lose his civil service pension.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

Kekul¨¦, who is due to retire in September anyway, said he ¡°cannot relate to the reasons for the dismissal¡±. Others are puzzled too, and some see darker motives in the university¡¯s behaviour than protecting the student experience.

One critic of the dismissal, blogger , the university merely investigated ¡°trivial workplace violations¡±, caused partly by laboratory restrictions during the pandemic. These would also have affected other academics, but the system ¡°only went after Kekul¨¦¡±. Goldstein also complains of the aggressive nature of the suspension, by means of a letter from the university that did not actually specify the allegations, but simply supported the punitive measures in principle. He makes the point that political motivations are never stated outright but conveyed in terms of surrogate claims about something else.

Kekul¨¦ was certainly critical of Germany¡¯s response to Covid-19. According to , he went as far as to make allegations about dishonest politicians, ¡°unscientific scientists and a monstrous waste of public money¡±, as well as the many unnecessary deaths he believed that Germany¡¯s inadequate reaction to the pandemic had caused. This, and his demands for a full investigation, undoubtedly made him powerful enemies. ?

It certainly wouldn¡¯t be the first time a German academic had fallen foul of the political authorities. Coincidentally, when writing this article, I heard a podcast on Hoffmann von Fallersleben, a professor of German language and literature, who was deprived of his chair in 1842 as a consequence of his cynically titled Unpolitische Lieder: Apolitical Songs, which were anything but, and seriously offended the Prussian authorities.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

But it may be that Kerkul¨¦¡¯s worst enemies were closer to home than the Bundestag. Kekul¨¦ explained that there was a ¡°long run-up to the entire matter¡± because, for years, he had been demanding appropriate personnel and equipment for his microbiological institute and the working conditions there were ¡°very stressful for my employees and myself¡±.

The university denies any improper motives for its treatment of Kerkul¨¦. In a statement, it says the proceedings against him are ¡°based solely on a breach of his official duties. A full professor is (among other things) obliged to teach courses in person. It is a core duty of their employment. This was violated for three semesters, disciplinary proceedings were initiated, and the university lecturer was temporarily suspended.¡±

The disciplinary proceedings have not yet been finalised and we don¡¯t know the full facts of the case, but it remains striking that Kerkul¨¦ has been suspended for more than two years when there are undoubtedly many cases of professors in Germany getting away with all manner of seriously unethical conduct, including research fraud, rigged appointment procedures and stolen authorship. So many observers are still left wondering why exactly Kekul¨¦ has been held so sternly to account for his own alleged misdeeds ¨C and whether the punishment fits the offence.

Brian Bloch is a journalist, academic editor and lecturer in English for academic research at the?University of M¨¹nster.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ