榴莲视频

University assessment chaos feared as external examiners quit

<榴莲视频 class="standfirst">Hundreds of academics refuse to take part in system as part of ongoing industrial action, prompting institutions to draw up contingency plans
三月 29, 2022
Exam invigilator
Source: iStock

UK universities are scrambling to make contingency plans amid fears that the mass resignation of external examiners could cause chaos during exam season.

Academics are refusing to take part in the system that upholds standards across the sector as part of ongoing industrial action over pension cuts and pay and working conditions.

In response to a steady stream of resignations over the past few weeks, some universities are already looking at using emergency measures that could see the external oversight system bypassed altogether – a?move critics say would devalue degrees.?

Meredith Warren, senior lecturer in biblical and religious studies at the University of Sheffield, has been keeping track of the resignations, and her spreadsheet shows that there had been 231 by 28 March.


THE Campus resource: Strategies for the constructive use of varied assessment methods


Universities across the board are affected but particularly Queen Mary University of London, where there has also been a local dispute, as well as UCL, King’s College London and the University of Leeds. Dr Warren predicted that the resignations could eventually bring the mechanisms for how universities approve degrees “grinding to a?halt”.

Matthew Paterson, professor in international politics at the University of Manchester, has resigned as an external examiner at Lancaster University.

“I think people are doing it for two interrelated reasons; it does have a potential pay-off,” he said. “You could actually achieve something that the strikes themselves don’t seem to be doing. If you have a few institutions failing to award degrees, that could be quite an interesting crisis.

“The other bit of it is desperation really: I?can’t do it any more, I?don’t have the goodwill to work for minimum wage for that sort of work. The workloads across the board have become intolerable. Looking ahead to June, I?have no?idea where I?will find that week to do the work.”

Philip Swanson, Hughes professor of Spanish at the University of Sheffield, has also stepped back from external examiner positions at the universities of St Andrews and Birmingham.

He said he was “no militant” and had not taken industrial action before but described himself as being “slightly radicalised” by the changes in academia over the past decade, pointing to “very top-down management” and a “lack of emphasis on academic values”.

“I’m 62, so in some ways I’m not doing this for myself as I?haven’t got that long to?go. But it is really about the future of my profession and discipline and the quality that is going to be on offer to future students,” he said.

Professor Swanson said his impression so far was that universities plan to “soak up the pressure and hope it fizzles out”. But there were signs that institutions were becoming increasingly concerned about the possible impact of the resignations – and a broader marking boycott that could be called by the University and College Union – over the exam period.

The University of Kent’s senate has passed a motion allowing meetings of boards of examiners to go ahead even if attendance is restricted by the dispute. It?will have full decision-making authority as long as it is attended by a?“senior participant external to the school” if no external examiners are available. A?spokesman stressed that the institution still plans to complete the external examination process as normal.

Assessment teams at King’s College London have been told that emergency regulations will be used if needed “to allow progression/award where performance is prevented by events which may be beyond the control of the college”.

A King’s spokeswoman said: “Our external process has not been disrupted or changed, and we will only use emergency regulations when needed to respond to circumstances as appropriate.”

tom.williams@timeshighereducation.com

<榴莲视频 class="pane-title"> 后记

Print headline:?UK universities shaken by mass resignation of external examiners

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
<榴莲视频 class="pane-title"> Reader's comments (10)
'Action short of a strike' is too weak a term for this. It is targeted strike action - a sort of academic smart bomb. The all-out strike feels like an out-dated scattergun by comparison, causing damage all round to limited effect. It will be interesting to see the results of the current strike ballot.
Years ago I did quite a lot of External Examining. I now wonder why. It had no benefit to my career, in fact it was probably perceived (by appointments committees) as a distraction. The payment offered for what can be quite a lot of work, is laughable. This applies across the board from UG to PhD level. The system needs a complete rethink. Perhaps a central agency with defined fees to coordinate full time and professionalised EE's across the sector? It's proper work, so why not make it a proper job?
I agree - I did it to add to my CV, but also because I thought it would be interesting. Instead it was dull, difficult, time-consuming, and poorly paid. I no longer engage in this activity.
Does the Office for Students have anything to say about the complete breakdown of the quality assurance process for University Assessment and/or the actions of senior management teams to circumvent the problem?
This could have the unintended consequence of heralding the end of the external examiner system. Not before time. It is a collective fiction that external examiners are the guarantors of academic standards. Evidence suggests they rarely play any significant role in promoting or protecting 'standards'. Witness the 40% of undergraduates awarded 'firsts' in 2020...
I recall the Dearing Report recommended a central register of external examiners who would be trained (and paid) and 'recognised' or registered. The sector rejected it as a threat to university 'autonomy'.
Time has come to reward external examiners fairly for their work based on the actual time spent to do the work, travel to the venue, accommodation, meals and so on. Else the UK will become a laughing stock and degrees will be devalued. Some countries not longer recognise certain degrees from some British universities, others do not recognised the first class degrees; and losing external examiners will be the last nail in the coffin for some.
As a very experienced external examiner I can safely say that these resignations will have zero effect.
Maybe at last we will realise the uselessness of external examiners. Harvard gets on very well without them.
A majority of students at Harvard and other elite colleges got in by having a parent alumnus, making a donation, or on a sports scholarship. Externals are not a perfect solution but they make for some kind of bar on practices in US where well heeled parents regularly ask to talk to faculty to query grades ... which can then be changed with no check.