榴莲视频

离开学术界是个漫长而情绪化的过程,但我很高兴自己离开了

<榴莲视频 class="standfirst">海伦·里斯(Helen Lees)说,忙碌的学术生活赋予你的使命感和人际关系是不容易被取代的——你可能会为此哭泣
八月 3, 2022
Person rubbing out on a black board, image ripped in half to illustrate Leaving is a long, emotional affair, but I’m glad I quit academia
Source: istock montage

点击阅读英文原文


当我4年前离开学术界的时候,我以为自己只是辞去了一份工作。正如所认为的那样,我的结论是,高校不再是我可以蓬勃发展的地方。工作量太大,监管太过严密。我必须离开这个职场。

我知道我需要找到新的赚钱方式。我知道我必须结交新朋友,建立新的人际关系。但没有人告诉我,离开学术界将是一段漫长的存在主义旅途,需要我从之前的身份中痛苦地、一层一层地剥离情感。

这是第4年。到目前为止,一切进展顺利。我搬到了托斯卡纳,在那里我体验了欢乐和笑声,同时我也像以前一样追求我的学术兴趣。大量我以前的学者同事告诉我,他们也想离开。他们正积极地为此做准备,我也注意到“学术界之外”相关的贵补肠别产辞辞办组群、社交媒体话题和其他建议来源的激增。新冠疫情显然让许多人重新思考什么是重要的,以及他们如何才能最好地处理轻重缓急。

但他们和我一样,似乎都认为离开是一件轻而易举的事。不幸的是,我最近正在写的新书表明,一旦那种摆脱无休止的电子邮件所带来的愉悦感消失,我并不是唯一一个感受到分离之痛的人。

我一直在邀请不在高校工作的同事分享他们在学术界之外的感受。事实证明,从一个学者到一个有其他兴趣、工作和活动的独立学者的转变几乎是普遍的挑战。悲伤和对现状的焦虑等情绪会意外出现。压力水平会飙升。你可能会哭。你可能开始每10分钟就查看一次收件箱,看看有什么变化。但你不会收到邮件。

就我个人而言,我感到失落,甚至精神错乱。忙碌的学术生活所赋予的使命感和联系是不容易被取代的。即使是现在,我仍觉得看着窗外,缓慢地深呼吸是一件很有挑战性的事。无所事事并不是你可以享受的一份甜蜜礼物。但我已经在逐渐适应了。我不再与“成就警察”保持联系。在我既厌恶,但事实上又憧憬的之外,我可以自由地做自己。

但并不是所有的“排毒案例”都达到了我这样相对成功的水平——这需要治疗师在头两年内的帮助。有些人需要持续的专业帮助。我采访过一位在一所着名大学攻读博士学位的人,她的专业是一个边缘化的学科,院系很少,职位更少。写完论文10多年后,她希望教授们能死去,因为对她而言,这些人占据了她的职位。她觉得自己的生活“不像以前那样”,现在她在看心理医生来帮助解决持续的抑郁症。

另一位独立学者在就业中心工作,但有时仍在学术界活动。然而,她认为许多专业研究人员很少面对面地接触他们所研究的问题,但头脑顽固,装作什么都懂。这让她不忿。

第叁位受访者最近辞去了他声名显赫的终身教职,开始了另一种生活,以一种不同的节奏走向自给自足。从单调的学术工作中走出来,他的轻松是显而易见的。但我也能看出,他的认同感仍留在了原先的部门。割舍这种感情并不容易。一个帮助博士毕业生在学术界之外找到工作的人告诉我,他们所有的客户都以某种形式化解悲伤。

当我感到被排斥在外,在学术名声和财富的雄心面前迷失时,我做了一些触觉缝纫、编织和园艺。我积极参与令人愉快的工作和生活。关键是把我的重心转移到“现实世界”。新事物比学术对话更值得关注。

我的互动方式也变得轻松起来,变得不那么正式和学术风,变得更加轻松和友好:我不再那么自以为无所不知,而是变得更加好奇。最近,我在倾听人们的想法之余,还会倾听他们灵魂的声音。

我和许多以前的同事保持着联系,偶尔也会被邀请写一个章节或做一个演讲。我这样做是为了朋友,但这种互动不再需要任何报酬,所以这是一种新的计算方法。

我注意到我以前的一些研究和原创贡献正在被人挪用——而且绝不是比我更优秀的人。起初,我很生气,因为离开学术界意味着我会被这样无视。但现在我真的不在乎了。

我不再奉行学术界极端竞争环境中刻薄的游戏、轻度冒犯和怨恨,这些也已经远离我的世界。我终于有一颗温暖大方的心了。我同情那些没有、或无法拥有这种感觉的人。愿我们都能茁壮成长!

是(Playing the University Game – The Art of University-Based Self-Education)一书的作者,该书将于8月由布鲁姆斯伯里出版社出版。她正在创作该书的后续作品,暂定名为《不玩高校游戏:作为高校之外的学者好好生活茁壮发展》(Not Playing the University Game: Living Well and Flourishing as an Academic Outside Universities)。她是约克圣约翰大学(York St John University)的访问研究员。

本文由陆子惠为泰晤士高等教育翻译。

<榴莲视频 class="pane-title"> 后记

Print headline:?Leaving is a long, emotional affair, but I’m glad I quit academia

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
<榴莲视频 class="pane-title"> 相关文章
<榴莲视频 class="pane-title"> Reader's comments (8)
Not all academics can leave academia. It is very difficult to continue to be an independent scholar if your research involves basic science and need for laboratory facilities. The solution is not to flee and allow the disintegration of academic rigour to continue but to tackle it head on and reclaim academic institutions for academics. This will mean standing up to the mediocrity that has crept in over the years.
It sounds a little like leaving the Armed Forces, but also like changing professions at the same time.
Phew - what tosh! Let me know when academics are so desperate to escape the alleged ‘panopticon’ horrors of modern wickedly neoliberal academic life by taking up truly exhausting and underpaid jobs as airport baggage handlers or in Amazon distribution sheds, or are retraining as much-needed nurses or HGV drivers - then I might be able to summon up some sympathy for the donnish proles!
Not to mention the baying online mobs of militants, on hair-trigger alert for anything that could start a career-ending heretic hunt.................
Its mawkishness aside, the article is right that university life has deteriorated over the past twenty years, and not just for professors, but students, as well. And the article points to a main source of the deterioration: administrative oversight and control. Universities are now much more rule-bound than they were, from what professors must include in their syllabi to the safe-and-respectful campus policies that restrict freedom of expression and encourage people to file complaints. Administrative bloat is bad enough, but when it consists of offices and officers overseeing equity, diversity and inclusion, it's oppressive. It won't get better, either. As the professors who enjoy academic anarchy and academic freedom, and who enjoy study for the sake of study, leave or retire, they're replaced by professors who clamour for even more rules and structures and who teach for the sake of shaping students into the correct attitudes and values.
'Moving to Tuscany' does not sound too hard - except you will consistently bump into professors from LSE [in particular] and other universities visiting their holiday villas. The best resistance to academic neoliberalism is to keep in the system but ignore its metrics and the management. This is what I have done. Be a good citizen, prioritise students and casual employees, write what you like, and ignore 'grant capture' if you don't need those.
That's what I've done also, essentially, as a survival technique.
Brilliant. Inspires me to find myself again. I got sucked into something disgusting in wanting to be an academic. And yes I believe getting out of that cult body, heart, mind, soul won't be a piece of cake. A brave article indeed.