View?the?THE?Japan?University Rankings 2022 results
The?Times Higher Education?Japan University Rankings use a balanced scorecard approach, with 16 individual performance indicators combining to create an overall score that reflects the broad strength of an institution. The overall methodology explores four key areas, which we call pillars:
Resources
This pillar includes metrics on?finance (income) per student (8%), which show whether the institution has the money to effectively deliver teaching, and the?ratio of faculty members to students (8%), which gives a sense of whether the college has enough teachers to teach. We also look at the?scholarly output (7%)?and?research grants per member of staff?(5%)?at each institution. Having faculty who are experts in their academic fields can significantly enhance a student’s educational experience. The final metric measures the national?mock university exam?scores (6%)?received by institutions’ entrants to get an indication of the academic calibre required to gain admission to a particular university and its popularity among top students.
Engagement
This pillar measures opinions of the university from two sources: the High School Advisors Survey and the Japan Student Survey. The High School Advisors Survey gathers the views of student careers advisers from?between 1,000 and 2,000 Japanese secondary schools each year. It asks advisers to name the top 15 universities that they believe teach students to the highest?global standards (6%), and the 15 universities that they think are best at?developing students’ abilities (6%). We are also using data from the last two years of our student survey, which is based on the same model used in previous teaching-focused rankings. Responses to seven questions are used in three metrics in the following manner:
- The?engagement metric (6%)?uses scores from four questions, asking to what extent teaching at the university (1)?supports critical thinking, (2)?supports making connections among the things students have learned, (3)?supports applying the students’ learning to the real world, and (4)?offers classes that challenge the students.
- The?interaction?metric?(6%)?uses scores from two questions, asking how many opportunities the students had to (1) interact with the staff and faculty and (2) collaborate with their peers.
- The?recommendation?metric?(6%)?uses scores from one question, which asks how likely students would be to recommend their university to friends or family.
Outcomes
This pillar looks at the overall?academic reputation (8%)?of the university in Japan, based on votes from Japanese scholars in?罢贬贰’s annual Academic Reputation Survey of leading academics worldwide, which helps us determine which institutions have the best reputation for excellence in teaching. We also consider the?reputation of the university among employers (8%)?to get a sense of whether?it produces graduates the market wants. This is based on a survey of human resources departments from 815 listed and non-listed companies. Each department was asked to identify the 10 best universities based on the strengths of their employees from those institutions. Each department then completed a survey for each of the 10?universities that it identified, rating the employees from these institutions in several areas.
Environment
This pillar looks at the make-up of the student and staff body at each campus, helping students determine whether they will find themselves in a diverse, supportive and inclusive university environment. We examine the proportion of?international students (5%)?and?international staff (5%)?on campus, which are key indicators of whether the university is able to attract talent from across the world. It also demonstrates which institutions have cultivated a multicultural campus where students from different backgrounds have the opportunity to learn from one another. We are also looking at two dimensions of internationalisation: the number of students in various types of?international exchange programmes (5%), and the number of?courses taught in a language other than Japanese (5%).
Note: International exchange programmes have been?significantly impacted by?the Covid-19 pandemic, with travel restrictions decreasing the number of students participating, or leading to the cancellation of some programmes altogether. As a result,?most institutions?reported?a significantly lower figure for this metric this year when compared with last year. To ensure the stability of the ranking, we are therefore reusing last year's?international exchange metric scores in the 2022 ranking.
Data sources
Data for the rankings come from a variety of sources. These include self-submitted data from the institutions as well as data gathered from Elsevier, Benesse Corporation, Nikkei Human Resources, the Japanese government and the?Times Higher Education?Academic Reputation Survey. Our data are, in most cases, normalised so that the value we assign in each metric can be compared sensibly with other metrics.
