ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

Counting on a Nobel

<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="standfirst">
December 19, 2003

It has been known for many years that Nobel prize-winners have a higher citation count than those who do not win a prize, and this fact has been used from time to time to predict future winners.

Raymond Damadian's claim ("Overlooked Nobel advertises his plight", THES , December 12) that he un-fairly missed out on the Nobel prize for physiology or medicine is not supported by his citation count, which although a respectable 1,828, is less than half the citation count of the winner, Paul Lauterbur, who has 4,415.

Charles Oppenheim
Department of information science
Loughborough University

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Sponsored
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Featured jobs