I agree wholeheartedly with Alison Wolf's view that entrance examinations are a better and fairer way to conduct admissions than interviews. But it's absurd to call Oxbridge's reliance on interviews "arrogant".
Abolishing the entrance examination was the reverse of arrogant; it was a timid, conciliatory, intellectually feeble attempt to make life easier for applicants from maintained schools. Wrong, certainly; arrogant, certainly not.
Alan Ryan
Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences
Stanford University, California
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Õ±á·¡¡¯²õ university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login