When eyebrows began to be raised about the political correctness of the phrase "ad hominem" (Letters, THES , August 10, 17) I asked my father, a retired classicist, for a view.
He tells me that homo indeed means human being with no gender marker. But he also pointed to a quotation from Virgil, which I have been unable to check, in which the phrase "et homini sunt" is used with reference to women. In other words, homo in classical times appears to have denoted a paid-up member of the human community, but with the implication that such a person is male. In my darker moments, I wonder how much this has changed.
Jenny Woodhouse
Cambridge
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Õ±á·¡¡¯²õ university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login