ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

I note that a number of articles and opinion pieces in THE in recent months have dealt with the value (or lack thereof) of student feedback/evaluation questionnaires.

Many years ago, I learned how best to massage such returns: take over a course for a?short period for a colleague on sabbatical, preferably at an entirely different university (students¡¯ unfamiliarity with the lecturer limits their risks and offers some variety in their lives); try to ensure that the course ends just before the Christmas holidays and closes with a ¡°fun¡± question-and-answer session (ensure there are prizes ¨C I offered organic beer and wine¡­oh, and chocolates); and, vitally, make friends with the departmental secretary.

When the automated, machine-read evaluation returns came back, I received the highest rating ever recorded in the department: 99 per cent. But there was one outlier ¨C for one student all the marks were in the opposite direction. The sensible departmental secretary reasoned something that the machine couldn¡¯t: the student evidently had misinterpreted the rating scale, so she reversed it. Ergo, 100?per cent for yours truly. (Make sure the secretary gets a Christmas present, too!)

Ron Iphofen
La Rochelle, France