Tara Brabazon's article on teaching qualifications ("Blind sides", 30 April) misrepresents my recent argument in these pages, no doubt inadvertently. I did not employ a "piquant inversion of logic" because I did not draw the absurd inference she attributes to me that "a lack of (teaching) qualifications leads to good teaching".
I was addressing the Liberal Democrats' proposal to link teaching grant with teaching quality, which assumed that possession of a teaching credential equals good teaching and lack of a credential equals poor teaching. I argued, drawing on experience of some bad but credentialled teachers at school and some uncredentialled but good teachers at university, that having a PGCE does not in itself make one a better teacher than someone who hasn't got one. I suggested no more than that.
Richard Austen-Baker, Lecturer in law, Lancaster University Law School.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Õ±á·¡¡¯²õ university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login