Derek Law accuses me of the "wilful conflation" of open-access journals with online repositories (Letters, January 6).
It seems improbable in the long term that universities and individual researchers will pay for "subscriber-pays" journals if the papers are available free elsewhere and those journals, therefore, suffer a loss of revenue.
By contrast, publishers of "author-pays" open-access journals, such as BioMed Central, will surely profit from the hasty introduction of institutional and subject repositories because their revenue depends on charges for the submission and/or acceptance of papers.
But huge questions remain over the long-term viability of author-pays journals, which is why the Royal Society is calling for more research into the impact of open-access models before they are introduced.
Martin Taylor
Vice-president, Royal Society
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Õ±á·¡¡¯²õ university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login