If we accept the plea by Gerry McKenna, Ulster University's former vice-chancellor, that accusations of "bullying and impairment through alcohol could have been misunderstandings of his heart and ulcer problems" ("'I was no bully', says McKenna", July 8), what does that say about his judgment that he continued working in sensitive post rather than taking sick leave (until forced to do so)? How can he act as an effective ambassador for Ulster in his role as president? Small wonder that questions are being asked about the university's use of public funds in this case.
Julian Newman
Edinburgh
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Õ±á·¡¡¯²õ university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login