I found your analysis of "conspiracy theories" utterly dispiriting ("They would say that ..." 4 June). Of course there are myriad conspiracy theories, a large percentage of which can be shown to be barking mad. But implicit in your argument is the view that scepticism about official explanations leads to complicity with the proliferation of conspiracy theories.
There is so much evidence for attempts to invalidate questions about officials' actions (MPs' expenses a current example) that it shouldn't be surprising if on occasion such questioning smacks of paranoia.
Wade Mansell, Professor of international law, University of Kent.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Õ±á·¡¡¯²õ university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login