Like many others, we have just received copies of the Economic and Social Research Council's strategic plan for 2009-14. The vision highlights the three "I"s: impact, innovation and interdisciplinarity. As directors of the five Language Based Area Studies (LBAS) centres, we enthusiastically support the ESRC's emphasis on all three "I"s. The LBAS initiative is already just such an innovative interdisciplinary project across the social sciences and humanities.
It seems to us, however, that the ESRC has missed a trick or two.
We are surprised that the ESRC's strategy seems to make so little of the humanities-social sciences interaction that can play a vital role in addressing so many of today's urgent research themes. For example, biomedical advances risk not making their mark if divorced from socio-economic research, but also if divorced from an understanding of culture and language.
In addition, we are disappointed that the ESRC has not highlighted more prominently language/communication, without which there is a risk that UK research in an interconnected world will fall short of achieving world-leading international impact.
ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ
Robin Aizlewood, Centre for East European Language Based Area Studies
Richard Berry and David Smith, Centre for Russian, Central and East European Studies
ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ
Elisabeth Kendall, Centre for the Advanced Study of the Arab World
Terry King and Glenn Hook, White Rose East Asia Centre
Frank Pieke, British Inter-university China Centre.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Õ±á·¡¡¯²õ university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login