<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title">
Articles by Dorothy Bishop ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ>
As the pandemic increases public scrutiny of science, the UK Parliament is holding another inquiry into the long-running issue of reproducibility. Five of its contributors give their views on how sloppy science can be eliminated and trust be more firmly rooted
Simpler options are imperfect but perhaps no more so than the panels¡¯ unavoidably cursory ¡®peer review¡¯ of submissions, says Dorothy Bishop
Academics remain wedded to prestige indicators, but peer reviewers may conclude that the journal is profiteering, says Dorothy Bishop
Both are too resource-intensive to be sustainable during this crisis, and their objectives can be achieved through other measures, argues Dorothy Bishop
Research will suffer from the collapse of professional development into financially fixated assessments of ¡®capability¡¯, say Gill Evans and Dorothy Bishop
Dorothy Bishop wishes people would stop reinforcing the idea that universities are places of privilege where the staff sit idly around thinking ¡®great thoughts¡¯
Dorothy Bishop will not miss Jo Johnson, but is under no illusions that new minister Sam Gyimah will overturn any of his reforms
The TEF will divide universities into 'institutional sheep and goats' and then starve the goats, writes Dorothy Bishop on the eve of the HE Bill's second reading
Justification for the teaching excellence framework in the 2016 HE White Paper is flawed, says Dorothy Bishop
Ministers must demonstrate that assessing ¡®excellence¡¯ does more good than harm, says Dorothy Bishop
How the government is proposing to use NSS data to assess teaching excellence is nonsense, says Dorothy Bishop
Dorothy Bishop takes a close look at the universities and science minister¡¯s NSS claims
Whether in jest or not, sexist language shows an insensitivity to gender issues at odds with academic values, argues Dorothy Bishop
Researchers face pressure to hype and report selectively, says Dorothy Bishop
A perverse focus on research cash and high-impact publications threatens academics¡¯ careers and the aims of science itself, says Dorothy Bishop