In his letter ¡°End ideologues¡¯ reign over imperial history¡± (3 May), Zareer Masani accuses us of ¡°character assassination¡±. To use his words, we take strong exception to this unsubstantiated allegation. Nowhere in anything either of us has written is there an attack on anyone¡¯s character. Nor do we convey a ¡°blanket condemnation of empire¡±. We have both argued repeatedly against both nostalgic defence and simple denunciation of empires.
Masani may very well disagree with us about the historical significance of current arguments over the ¡°case for colonialism¡±. But we invite readers to compare the tone of his letter with that of our article ¡°Don¡¯t mistake nostalgia about the British empire for scholarship¡± (Opinion, 26 April), and to decide for themselves which is a ¡°diatribe¡± conveying ¡°hysteria¡±.
James McDougall
Fellow and tutor in modern history
Trinity College, University of Oxford
Kim A. Wagner
Senior lecturer in British imperial history?
Queen Mary University of London
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ>Send toÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ>
Letters should be sent to:?THE.Letters@timeshighereducation.com
Letters for publication in?Times Higher Education?should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Õ±á·¡¡¯²õ university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login