Threats by transgender rights activists to disrupt an academic conference on prison reform over the organiser¡¯s allegedly ¡°transphobic¡± views on how inmates should be segregated have led to its cancellation.

More than 300 people were expected to attend a two-day conference on prison abolition in the UK at the Open University¡¯s campus in Milton Keynes at the end of May, but delegates have been notified that the event has been called off.

The organisers, the Centre of Crime and Justice Studies (CCJS), an educational charity, did not explain the exact reason for the sudden cancellation to delegates, but?Times Higher Education?has learned that it was scrapped after activists vowed to target the event over the group¡¯s policy that transgender prisoners should be incarcerated??from cis-gender female offenders.

Its advice,??in February, follows the case of transgender prisoner Karen White, who was jailed in October 2018 for sexually assaulting inmates in a women¡¯s prison while on remand for rape charges.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

However, campaigners have claimed that the centre¡¯s recommendations support ¡°state-sanctioned murder¡±, given the suicides of several transgender prisoners in male prisons.

A leaflet distributed by the Trans Liberation Assembly ¨C?a collective of militant feminist groups ¨C describes the ¡°abhorrent transphobia [of] so-called respectable academics at the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies¡± as a ¡°sinister factor in this increasingly violent treatment enacted against trans women who are victims of the prison estate¡±.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

That literature, which criticised ¡°measures [that] demonise trans women as posing an inherent threat to ¡®real¡¯ women¡±, was handed out as 50 protesters occupied the Ministry of Justice on International Women¡¯s Day on 8 March.

With reports that the same protesters intended to target the OU?event in May, organisers emailed delegates on 6 March to say that the conference had been cancelled after one of its partners [the OU] had been ¡°subjected to concerted pressure by those intent on disrupting the conference¡±.

In a statement, the Open University suggested, however, that it had cancelled the event over ¡°concerns that discussion around this conference was moving away from its main, originally intended, focus ¨C to debate the past, present and future of prison abolition¡±.

The event¡¯s cancellation is the latest in a series of flashpoints over academics¡¯ views on gender self-identification and whether transgender women should have access to areas, such as prisons, where vulnerable women are housed. In December, Rosa Freedman, professor of law, conflict and global development at the University of Reading,??how her office door had been covered in urine and how she had received threatening anonymous phone calls after debating proposed gender law changes.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

One activist group, the Incarcerated Workers Organising Committee, has??that the CCJS¡¯ director Richard Garside, a senior visiting research fellow at the OU, is guilty of propagating ¡°sustained transmisogynist pressure¡± in the media by supporting ¡°transphobic measures to segregate incarcerated trans women¡±.

Kathleen Stock, professor of philosophy at the University of Sussex, who has faced hostility from students over her views on gender identification, said that the cancellation was the latest example of how pressure from transgender campaigners was having a ¡°chilling effect on the richness of discussion¡± in this area.

¡°Richard Garside¡¯s views on this are incredibly moderate and well-considered, so if you can¡¯t make statements like these, then something is really up,¡± said Professor Stock.

¡°People have stuck things to my office saying I am not welcome on campus and students have held placards on campus saying that I am transphobic,¡± Professor Stock added. ¡°I think the worry about no platforming can be exaggerated, but it is happening in this area.¡±

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com