ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

Fee hike ¡®has not driven teaching improvement¡¯, says UUK panel

<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="standfirst">Raising tuition fees to ?9,000 has not helped drive improvements in teaching despite the government¡¯s insistence it would improve standards
January 6, 2015

That is among the interim findings of Universities UK¡¯s Student Funding Panel, which was established last year to examine the current system.

With the general election only five months away, the panel hope that the recommendations will pay a significant role in shaping the manifestos of the three main parties.

After hearing from a number of prominent figures in higher education and policy, the panel, which is itself made up of education experts and high-profile university figures, says there is ¡°little evidence that the reforms have improved incentives for institutions to pursue innovations in teaching¡±.

It also finds fee increases have led to a drop in the number of ¡°flexible¡± places available to students, with the 2012 reforms coinciding with ¡°the number of part-time undergraduate entrants to institutions in England having almost halved between 2010-11 and 2013-14¡±.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

Commenting on tuition fees directly, the panel raised concerns about the amount of money being repaid by post-2012 undergraduates and some members said the repayment period of 30 years was too long. ?

The panel also expressed concerns about the level of support available to students experiencing financial difficulties ¡°who do not qualify for the full package of maintenance support¡±.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

However, the document is noteworthy for not making any recommendation on the fee cap level, even though a number of vice-chancellors have questioned whether it should rise above ?9,000.

In 2013, Sir Christopher Snowden, UUK president and vice-chancellor of the University of Surrey - and chair of the funding panel - said the ?9,000 cap ¡°could not be frozen forever¡±. His comments followed others made by University of Liverpool vice-chancellor Sir Howard Newby and the University of Oxford¡¯s Andrew Hamilton, who have both raised questions about the future of the fee cap.

Commenting on the panel¡¯s interim findings, Sir Christopher called on more work to be done to see how the fees system in England could be further improved.

¡°There has been a lot of commentary recently about the long-term financial sustainability of the current funding and fees system in England,¡± he said.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

¡°We need more evidence on how the system can best deliver value for money for students, encourage greater participation of part-time and mature students and provide a stable funding environment for all universities.¡±

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Sponsored
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Featured jobs