ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

More academics are quitting X but universities stay put for now

<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="standfirst">Universities stick with controversial social media platform now, driven by need to support student recruitment
September 24, 2024
Shanghai,China-July 30th 2023 X (new Twitter), Threads, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, WeChat, WhatsApp. Douyin(TikTok) and Sina Weibo app icons. Assorted online social media software brands
Source: iStock/Robert Way

Growing numbers of academics are quitting X, but universities may take longer to fully leave the divisive social media platform, according to experts.

Billionaire Elon Musk¡¯s takeover of what was then Twitter two years ago?triggered an initial exodus of researchers, but others have held back from migrating to an alternative platform such as the Meta-owned Threads or Bluesky because it would involve ¡°starting from scratch¡±, said Andrew Chadwick, professor of political communication at Loughborough University.

In the UK, X¡¯s failure to clamp down on misinformation that sparked riots over the summer and Mr Musk¡¯s direct attacks on the country have triggered ¡°another step change in academic researchers¡¯ attitudes to the platform¡±, he said.

¡°It was already perceived to be toxic by many researchers, but now I think that we¡¯ve reached a new level of toxicity, and I think you¡¯re starting to see quite a lot of people now actively looking for alternatives,¡± added Professor Chadwick.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

Jisc, UK higher education¡¯s main technology body, is among those to have left X in recent weeks.

Although the platform is a ¡°complete mess¡± of spam and dubious content, Nick Anstead, associate professor in the department of media and communications at the London School of Economics, said a credible alternative had yet to emerge.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°To move to a new social platform is a really big collective action problem. It¡¯s not just about individuals moving, it¡¯s about people¡¯s relationships that they¡¯ve constructed on that platform over years, in many cases,¡± he said.

While many universities will feel that they have to remain on X to reach prospective students and alumni, Dr Anstead warned that they could face a ¡°brand issue¡± if public discontent with X¡¯s lax moderation policy of extreme views grows.


Campus resource: It¡¯s time: how to get your department off X


¡°Lots of corporations have pulled back because they don¡¯t want to be associated with that space any more,¡± he said.

¡°Universities are lots of things, but they are also brands, and they have reputations to protect, and so there may be value in looking at alternative social media spaces if Twitter becomes problematic.¡±

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

by Andy Tattersall, an information specialist in the University of Sheffield¡¯s School of Medicine and Population Health, found that, of 264 academic organisational accounts examined, including publishers, funders and learned societies, almost all were still active on X.

A minority had opened accounts on Bluesky, Threads or Mastodon, but many were yet to start actively posting on these platforms.

Mr Tattersall said that universities were likely to have been even slower on the uptake. ¡°Large organisations aren¡¯t very agile when it comes to this kind of technology adoption,¡± he said.

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Universities slower to exit X than academics

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Related articles

Elon Musk¡¯s ¡®de facto town square¡¯ is a place where misinformation abounds and where academia is often attacked by culture warriors. But is fighting back effective? Or can it make things worse if academics don¡¯t keep calm and stick to the facts? Tom Williams reports 

8 December
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Reader's comments (1)
All social media platforms have both good and bad aspects and affect mental health. In my personal opinion the negative mental health aspects outweigh any benefit. It is self deluding to think one social media platform is "better" than another. They are all ultimately driven by algorithms to drive your attention. Which brings up the interesting situation that if people are leaving X then that suggests the algorithm is not driving attention. Let's be honest why do unis stay on, because they they think they will make money out of it, either by increased entitlement or investment due to increased awareness. So the whole thing is grubby anyway. Academics can get the information out without social media - we all managed it before Social Media. So it is clearly not indispensable. So in my opinion everyone ought to reduce social media use if not stop it altogether. Everyone's mental health would improve if people just go out and "touch grass" as the youth of today say
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Sponsored
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Featured jobs
ADVERTISEMENT