It is good to see greater encouragement and support of researchers in communicating negative results (¡°Stop binning negative results, researchers told¡±, News, 29 March). A number of journals, including BioMed Central¡¯s BMC series, are open to publishing negative results; but my own conversations with researchers have indicated that there is not always enough encouragement to submit such papers, or that they can feel under pressure to focus on getting something ¡°positive¡± published.
We discussed the importance of negative results in in BMC Research Notes in February. (Conflict of interest statement: I am publisher for the BMC series of journals.)
Diana Marshall
Via timeshighereducation.com
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ>Send toÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ>
Letters should be sent to:?THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in?Times Higher Education?should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Õ±á·¡¡¯²õ university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login