榴莲视频

'Migrant health levy' planned for overseas students

<榴莲视频 class="standfirst">International students coming to the UK could have to pay at least ?200 a year to use the National Health Service under plans unveiled by the government.
七月 3, 2013

released today says that the NHS “cannot continue as an international rather than a national health service” and is “very generous” to those living overseas.

“Our current system…attracts ‘health tourists’ - people who take advantage of our current generous entitlements and are able to avoid detection or payment,” it says.

The consultation proposes to charge anyone from outside the EU who is in the UK for up to five years, which would include students.

The “migrant health levy” would be collected on entry to the country, although could be waived if the migrant has private health insurance.

The consultation says the levy should be at least ?200 a year. ?

Daniel Stevens, international students’ officer at the National Union of Students, Tweeted that he hoped to see “at least one week of policy announcements that aren’t detrimental to international students”.

However, the consultation does leave the door open for students to be charged less than other groups. In asking respondents for their views on how high the charge should be, it says the “wider economic value of students” can be taken into account.

The levy “might vary for different groups,” it adds.

Student visitors, who stay for less than six months, will continue to be charged at the point of use when they use the NHS. ?

The consultation says that the problem of health tourism is “significant” but has launched an audit to see exactly how much of a drain it is.

david.matthews@tsleducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
<榴莲视频 class="pane-title"> Reader's comments (1)
This shows excellent, cross-goverment, thinking on how to muck up international student recruitment. It appears that the 榴莲视频 Office ministers have run oput of new things to make up, now that they've issued sufficient numbers of statements saying all the new measures are working. That means opening new lines of assault. Bonds, in case people don't go back. A health tax in case they get sick. Perhaps there's scope for further action: what about the other departments of government?