This ranking looks at the broader ways in which universities support the SDGs through collaboration with other countries, the promotion of best practices and the publication of data. Unless all partners work together towards the SDGs, they cannot be achieved.

This is the only compulsory SDG for inclusion in the overall rankings. It is also worth a smaller proportion of the final score in the overall table.

View the?methodology?for the Impact Rankings 2022?to find out how these data are used in the overall ranking.

Metrics

Research (27.1%)

• Proportion of academic publications with co-author from low- or lower middle-income country (13.55%)
• Number of publications that relate to the 17 SDGs (13.55%)

The first indicator measures the proportion of academic publications that are co-authored by someone from another country. The country that the partner organisation is in must be defined as low income or lower-middle income by the World Bank.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

The second indicator measures the number of publications that relate to the 17 SDGs.

The data are provided by Elsevier¡¯s Scopus dataset and normalised across the range using Z-scoring. The dataset includes all indexed publications between 2016 and 2020.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

Relationships to support the goals (18.5%)

• Relationships with regional NGOs?and government for SDG policy (3.7%)
• Cross-sectoral dialogue about SDGs with government or NGOs (3.7%)
• Collaborating internationally to capture data relating to SDGs (3.7%)
• Collaborating internationally to develop best practice on tackling SDGs (3.7%)
• Collaborating with NGOs to tackle SDGs through student volunteering programmes, research programmes or educational resources (3.7%)

The evidence was provided directly by universities, evaluated and scored by?Times Higher Education?and not normalised.

Publication of SDG reports (27.2%)

We asked institutions whether they published specific data on their performance against each of the 17 SDGs. We gave extra credit for documents that are in the public domain.

The evidence for this metric was evaluated and scored by?THE?and was not normalised.

Education for the SDGs (27.2%)

• Commitment to meaningful education around the SDGs across the university, relevant and applicable to all students (9.06%)
• Dedicated courses (full degrees, or electives) that address sustainability and the SDGs (9.06%)
• Dedicated outreach educational activities for the wider community, which could include alumni, local residents, displaced people?(9.06%)

This metric?explores how universities are teaching the next generation to adopt sustainability in their lives.?In 2022, two new indicators were included under?this metric relating to dedicated courses addressing sustainability and dedicated outreach activities.?

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

The evidence for this metric was evaluated and scored by?THE?and was not normalised.

Evidence

When we ask about policies and initiatives, our metrics require universities to provide the evidence to support their claims. Evidence is evaluated against a set of criteria and decisions are cross-validated where there is uncertainty. Evidence is not required to be exhaustive ¨C we are looking for examples that demonstrate best practice at the institutions concerned.

Time frame

In general, the data used refer to the closest academic year to January to December 2020. However, in some cases, data relate to 2019 due to the disruption caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. The date range for each metric is specified in the full methodology document.?

Exclusions

Universities must teach undergraduates and be validated by a recognised accreditation body to be included in the ranking.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

Data collection

Institutions provide and sign off their institutional data for use in the rankings. On the rare occasions when a particular data point is not provided, we enter a value of zero.

View the full methodology for the?THE?Impact Rankings 2022?.?

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ