榴莲视频

Australian student caps thwarted as parliamentary defeat looms

<榴莲视频 class="standfirst">Visa processing chaos set to continue amid opposition parties’ rejection of proposal to limit international student numbers
十一月 18, 2024
Sunrise Skyline at Commonwealth Bridge in Canberra
Source: iStock

The Australian government’s plan to?cap international student enrolments next year appears to?have been thwarted, with reports that the opposition will vote against the underpinning legislation.

With the Australian Greens firmly against caps, opposition from the Liberal Party and its National coalition partners would give the bill no?prospect of?success in?its current form.

The development will do little to relieve the uncertainty facing educational administrators as they struggle to nail down next year’s student numbers.

The caps have loomed as a nightmare scenario for some universities and colleges, potentially forcing them to?rescind places that international students had already accepted. The proposal would cause most difficulty to top-ranked universities that recruit tens of thousands of foreign students and private colleges with such low indicative caps that they face bankruptcy.

However, the legislation’s apparent deferral means that the sector remains saddled with ministerial direction?107 (MD107), a?triaging mechanism that delays the processing of visas for students who come from countries – or are enrolled with institutions – deemed to pose a moderate or high immigration risk.

Visa delays and rejections associated with MD107 have particularly affected institutions that draw substantial enrolments from south Asia and parts of Africa and Latin America. The government has promised to replace MD107, but only after parliament passes the bill to limit international student numbers.

The legislation was listed for debate in the Senate on 18?November, but that did not eventuate. Education minister Jason Clare confirmed that MD107 would remain as “the de?facto cap” if the Senate failed to pass the bill.

“The National Party MPs and senators in this building…are quietly telling me they want this bill passed,” he told journalists. “They know that at the moment, the way the system works [is] benefiting the big unis in the city and it’s hurting the small unis in the bush. That’s why I?want to pass this legislation, so that I?can help those smaller universities in the regions.”

The International Education Association of Australia warned that the “blunt instrument” of enrolment caps would now be replaced by the “vagaries” of?MD107. “This will involve giving absolute visa approval preference to some providers over others,” said chief executive Phil Honeywood.

“By just opposing the…legislation, the coalition is?not providing our sector with any apparent alternative policy. We’re going to have a dog’s breakfast situation from now until the start of the academic year…only a few months away.”

But Independent Higher Education Australia, which represents private colleges, praised the coalition’s intervention. “[It]?demonstrates a clear understanding of the potential damage this legislation could inflict on our…higher education system and our reputation as a premier destination for international students,” said chief executive Peter Hendy.

“This bill, if passed, would undermine years of hard work and investment in building Australia’s international education reputation.”

The Group of Eight said the coalition’s decision to oppose the bill was a “welcome relief”. Universities Australia, the Innovative Research Universities and the Regional Universities Network said the government should rescind MD107 immediately.

“Some universities, particularly those in outer suburban and regional areas…are on their knees due to the financial impact of this destructive instrument,” said Universities Australia chief executive Luke Sheehy.

He said a “vibrant higher education sector” was unachievable without revenue from international education. “This appears to be lost on both sides of politics as they continue to treat international students as cannon fodder in the political battle over migration and housing.”

The National Tertiary Education Union’s president, Alison Barnes, said vice-chancellors who had “used the proposed caps as a smokescreen to threaten jobs must now abandon their terrible plans”.

Times Higher Education sought comment from the office of shadow education minister Sarah Henderson.

john.ross@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.