ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

Online Learning Rankings 2024: results announced

<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="standfirst">Eleven universities across four continents are awarded gold in first attempt to measure online learning on a global basis
December 10, 2024
Online Learning Rankings 2024. Woman in headscarf having online lesson on laptop at cafe.
Source: Prostock-Studio/iStock (edited)

What does successful online learning look like? That is the question Times Higher Education set out to answer with the new Online Learning Rankings (OLR). While online education has been a feature of the internet since its inception ¨C let¡¯s not forget?the internet¡¯s origin as a way to share scientific studies ¨C the past few years have laid bare the importance of online learning, as well as the difficulties in implementing it.

Online courses enabled students to continue studying through the Covid-19 pandemic, and provide access to higher education for those?living in conflict areas such as Ukraine. They bring the possibility of qualifications to those living in education deserts, and of professional development to lifelong learners. But the quality of that education is not uniform, and as the importance of online provision?becomes ever more obvious, there is no global standard on how to measure the teaching quality of higher education delivered online. The?THE Online Learning Rankings 2024 is the first attempt to measure online learning on a global basis.

There is also no global agreement on the definition of online learning.?This pilot ranking measures only the parts of universities that deliver online learning, which means?the courses are advertised as ¡°online¡± and at least 40 per cent of the content is delivered online.

In putting together the inaugural?OLR,?THE¡¯s data team found stark differences in the types of provision: from traditional campus universities adding online elements, to fully online operations such as open universities, to new institutions trying to provide higher education to people living in rural areas of low-income countries. Universities have different reasons for, and aims of, online learning and this makes it hard to provide precise ranks. Therefore, THE has grouped institutions into three categories: gold, silver and bronze.

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

In the gold category are?11 universities: three from the US, two from the UK, two from India, and one each from Russia, Hungary, New Zealand and Australia. Fourteen universities are in the silver category and 31 in bronze. A further 64 are given reporter status as they submitted data but did not meet the full entry requirements.


Online Learning Rankings 2024: gold-awarded universities?

Institutions are listed alphabetically.?

Institution Country Resources score Engagement score Outcomes score Environment score
American University United States 69.5 72.3 53.3 72.1
Arizona State University (Tempe) United States? 56.2 67.5 49.4 72.2
HSE University Russia 62.5 79.2 61.2 57.2
Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies India 65.4 62.8 64.1 70.9
Massey University New Zealand 45.5 92.6 27.3 81.4
O.P. Jindal Global University India 72.3 58.2 79.2 78.0
University of Central Florida United States 86.5 56.9 71.5 71.1
University of Essex UK 56.7 76.8 69.2 41.5
University of Liverpool UK 72.3 52.8 77.6 57.8
University of South Australia Australia 73.5 45.1 50.1 63.3
University of Szeged Hungary? 72.7 54.3 44.2 67.9

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

In this pilot edition, THE?used 17 metrics grouped into four pillars: resources, which measures the staff and resources devoted to online learning; engagement, which?has six metrics, including student survey responses to compare the level of student engagement; outcomes, which measures student progression and whether they would recommend it to others; and environment, which tracks inclusion, diversity and support levels.

The US¡¯ University of Central Florida (gold) is top globally for resources, while New Zealand¡¯s Massey University (gold) achieves the highest scores for both engagement and environment. Ukraine¡¯s Sumy State University is awarded silver but gains the highest score globally for outcomes. Among those awarded gold, India¡¯s?O.P. Jindal Global University achieves the best outcomes score.

In contrast to the research-focused?THE?World University Rankings, no university achieves high scores in all?of the pillars in the OLR,?reflecting the?varying aims of online education providers and perhaps also the burgeoning nature of online learning. The most consistent performer in the gold category is India's Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies; it is the only university?to score above 60 out of 100 in all four pillars.?


Campus resource collection: The business of online education


While the results and the underlying data provide interesting insights, they also contribute to?an important global conversation?about how best to assess and understand online learning?¨C a large and growing?part of the global higher education sector that is still not properly understood or regulated.?°Õ±á·¡¡¯s data team is planning to?launch?a consultation process on the OLR in early 2025 to improve the approach and methodology for future years.

Curtis Bonk, an education and technology expert at Indiana University, a reporter institution in the ranking, said that success in online higher education differs depending on the aim of the online provision.

¡°We must ask, success for who and success in terms of what criteria? Success is not simply measured by retention and completion rates, comparison test scores, and satisfaction surveys any more,¡± he said. ¡°From a learner¡¯s perspective who previously lacked access to many educational opportunities because he or she is in the Global South or an education desert, success occurs every time you power up your computer and are able to access online contents and learn.¡±?

Arizona State University (ASU) is one of the institutions in the gold category and is renowned for its digital leadership; it scores particularly highly in the environment and engagement pillars in the OLR. Phil Regier, ASU¡¯s dean for educational initiatives, told THE that ¡°everything we do at ASU concerning online learning is through the lens of ensuring access¡±.

¡°Let¡¯s say, for example, we have a student who doesn¡¯t qualify for admission into the university. We don¡¯t turn them away. We work directly with students to identify the courses they need and offer them online, allowing students to pay for credits only after completing the course and being satisfied with their grades,¡± he said.?

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

While the aims of online learning provision can vary by institution, universities delivering these courses?face many of the same challenges. According to Dr?Regier these?range?¡°from ensuring equitable access, to maintaining high engagement and academic rigor. A diverse, global student body means navigating differences in technology access, time zones, and language proficiency, all of which can impact a learner¡¯s ability to fully participate.¡±

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

One of the biggest hurdles, Regier said, is ensuring that online learners feel part of the university community. This requires ¡°innovative engagement strategies that go beyond classroom participation to foster a strong sense of belonging within the broader university community¡±.

Linda Harasim, a professor emerita at Simon Fraser University, has written several books on learning theory and online technology. ¡°In my 40 years of research and teaching online higher education, I have found that community building is essential in the online classroom,¡± she said. ¡°Peer collaboration and community represent some of the greatest opportunities for effective learning and augmentation of human intelligence. Humans are genetically programmed to learn best from one another.¡±

However, she added that?¡°teachers face significant challenges in this area. The field has provided little training on the processes involved in creating online learning communities. This lack of support is a significant obstacle to effective online education for both teachers and learners.¡±

Professor?Bonk agreed that creating a community was vital and?warned that ¡°any attempts to design online communities in an eight week or 16-week course can be extremely time consuming and difficult¡±.

¡°Communities typically don¡¯t just suddenly emerge; they require lots of care and attention. For communities to form, instructors need skills in how to moderate online discussion as well as how to foster engagement among online learners. They also have to help build identity and a shared history,¡± he said.

For Professor Harasim, teaching online higher education requires different skills to teaching in-person, and universities fail if they do not?facilitate?lecturers to gain those extra credentials.

Meanwhile, technological developments, while also bringing new opportunities,?create additional?challenges. None more so than artificial intelligence. Professor Harasim is wary of the direction it is headed.

¡°Today¡¯s educational AI software is for-profit, based on a business model with limited educational input on the design of the pedagogy or technology. The values in the technology are profit, not necessarily public interest,¡± she said. ¡°Educational AI is an immense challenge for educational institutions, in that it represents a fundamental shift in control of the institutional mission, values, process and community-focused model.¡±

Whether AI is a help or a hindrance, it is clear that the importance of online higher education is only going to grow, and universities will need to rise to the challenge.


Online Learning Rankings 2024:?results

Institutions are listed alphabetically within each tier.?

Institution Country/territory Tier Resources score Engagement score Outcomes score Environment score
American University United States Gold 69.5 72.3 53.3 72.1
Arizona State University (Tempe) United States Gold 56.2 67.5 49.4 72.2
HSE University Russian Federation Gold 62.5 79.2 61.2 57.2
Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies India Gold 65.4 62.8 64.1 70.9
Massey University New Zealand Gold 45.5 92.6 27.3 81.4
O.P. Jindal Global University India Gold 72.3 58.2 79.2 78.0
University of Central Florida United States Gold 86.5 56.9 71.5 71.1
University of Essex United Kingdom Gold 56.7 76.8 69.2 41.5
University of Liverpool United Kingdom Gold 72.3 52.8 77.6 57.8
University of South Australia Australia Gold 73.5 45.1 50.1 63.3
University of Szeged Hungary Gold 72.7 54.3 44.2 67.9
BINUS University Indonesia Silver 65.8 41.5 58.8 37.6
Don State Technical University Russian Federation Silver 57.8 62.1 64.6 49.1
International University of Applied Sciences (IUBH) Germany Silver 39.5 58.0 49.2 74.9
King Abdulaziz University Saudi Arabia Silver 31.9 50.2 77.3 55.5
National Technical University Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute Ukraine Silver 44.8 53.3 61.9 42.6
Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais Brazil Silver 24.0 85.3 36.6 57.3
Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences India Silver 57.5 35.6 61.9 62.4
Sumy State University Ukraine Silver 44.6 45.7 84.4 49.4
Tecnol¨®gico de Monterrey Mexico Silver 62.4 56.4 49.1 20.7
UNIR ¨C International University of La Rioja Spain Silver 57.6 65.3 64.0 37.0
Universidad Aut¨®noma del Estado de Mexico (UAEMex) Mexico Silver 63.3 46.6 69.5 55.5
Universidad T¨¦cnica Particular de Loja Ecuador Silver 50.7 61.0 39.4 45.1
University of Guadalajara Mexico Silver 57.2 69.1 59.8 50.1
University of Santo Tomas Philippines Silver 49.4 66.0 50.5 50.3
Allama Iqbal Open University Pakistan Bronze 34.2 52.0 18.2 43.4
Amity University, Noida India Bronze 34.3 46.0 59.9 46.0
Anadolu University Turkey Bronze 39.3 45.2 27.2 41.2
Atat¨¹rk University Turkey Bronze 40.0 46.0 57.9 47.9
Cyber University inc. Japan Bronze 42.4 37.8 76.0 49.0
Damascus University Syria Bronze 38.4 67.3 61.6 26.6
Deakin University Australia Bronze 33.0 55.0 41.2 55.2
Duy Tan University Vietnam Bronze 29.0 7.7 42.6 44.0
Gazi University Turkey Bronze 41.1 50.4 68.7 31.3
Hellenic Open University Greece Bronze 27.9 41.7 58.5 42.0
Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology Pakistan Bronze 55.0 20.5 31.9 70.1
KL University India Bronze 31.5 46.5 60.3 35.2
Lovely Professional University India Bronze 40.2 27.5 38.2 60.9
Manipal University Jaipur India Bronze 41.9 24.8 39.5 68.8
Metropolitan College Greece Bronze 43.0 42.2 59.4 46.7
Midocean University Comoros Bronze 13.5 76.6 65.3 50.7
Ondokuz Mayis University Turkey Bronze 24.6 40.6 3.1 41.3
Port Said University Egypt Bronze 50.9 35.7 16.2 51.6
S¨¹leyman Demirel University Turkey Bronze 29.7 13.7 3.7 25.8
Telkom University Indonesia Bronze 21.8 22.2 46.2 25.3
Universidad Pedagogica y Tecnologica de Colombia - UPTC Colombia Bronze 20.2 56.9 41.9 44.5
Universidad Polit¨¦cnica Salesiana Ecuador Bronze 39.3 57.7 36.0 43.7
Universitas Negeri Surabaya Indonesia Bronze 20.2 24.6 23.6 37.8
Universitas Padjadjaran Indonesia Bronze 14.7 37.1 27.9 26.2
Universitas Terbuka - Indonesia Open University Indonesia Bronze 9.2 33.9 42.1 34.9
University of Bucharest Romania Bronze 57.3 14.6 15.3 58.7
University of Burgos Spain Bronze 73.3 7.6 21.0 53.4
V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Ukraine Bronze 21.3 50.7 29.3 29.0
Villa College Maldives Bronze 49.4 31.2 22.0 40.8
West University of Timi?oara Romania Bronze 46.5 69.7 48.9 24.6
World University of Bangladesh (WUB) Bangladesh Bronze 32.9 28.5 41.0 22.5
Bah?e?ehir University Turkey Reporter ? ? ? ?
Ba?kent University Turkey Reporter ? ? ? ?
Dei Institute - Online University (DIOU) Tanzania Reporter ? ? ? ?
Dhurakij Pundit University Thailand Reporter ? ? ? ?
Dr D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune India Reporter ? ? ? ?
EAE Business School Spain Reporter ? ? ? ?
European University Cyprus Cyprus Reporter ? ? ? ?
Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul Brazil Reporter ? ? ? ?
Federal University of Pernambuco Brazil Reporter ? ? ? ?
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation Russian Federation Reporter ? ? ? ?
Florida International University United States Reporter ? ? ? ?
Fluminense Federal University Brazil Reporter ? ? ? ?
George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures Romania Reporter ? ? ? ?
GLA University India Reporter ? ? ? ?
Ibn Tofa?l University Morocco Reporter ? ? ? ?
Icesi University Colombia Reporter ? ? ? ?
Indiana University United States Reporter ? ? ? ?
Inesem Business School Spain Reporter ? ? ? ?
Irkutsk State University Russian Federation Reporter ? ? ? ?
Istanbul University-Cerrahpa?a Turkey Reporter ? ? ? ?
Kafrelsheikh University Egypt Reporter ? ? ? ?
King Faisal University Saudi Arabia Reporter ? ? ? ?
Lebanese American University Lebanon Reporter ? ? ? ?
Louisiana State University United States Reporter ? ? ? ?
LSPR Institute of Communication & Business Indonesia Reporter ? ? ? ?
Map¨²a University Philippines Reporter ? ? ? ?
Missouri University of Science and Technology United States Reporter ? ? ? ?
New Jersey Institute of Technology United States Reporter ? ? ? ?
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University Russian Federation Reporter ? ? ? ?
Pontif¨ªcia Universidade Cat¨®lica do Paran¨¢ Brazil Reporter ? ? ? ?
Saudi Electronic University Saudi Arabia Reporter ? ? ? ?
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Iran Reporter ? ? ? ?
Sohag University Egypt Reporter ? ? ? ?
Tashkent State University of Law Uzbekistan Reporter ? ? ? ?
Tokat Gaziosmanpa?a University Turkey Reporter ? ? ? ?
Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics Russian Federation Reporter ? ? ? ?
Tula State University Russian Federation Reporter ? ? ? ?
UEES, Espiritu Santo University Ecuador Reporter ? ? ? ?
Universidad Cat¨®lica San Antonio de Murcia (UCAM) Spain Reporter ? ? ? ?
Universidad Estatal a Distancia Costa Rica Reporter ? ? ? ?
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana (UPB) Colombia Reporter ? ? ? ?
Universidade Eduardo Mondlane Mozambique Reporter ? ? ? ?
Universidade Estadual de Maring¨¢ Brazil Reporter ? ? ? ?
Universidade Federal de Sergipe Brazil Reporter ? ? ? ?
Universit¨¦ 8 Mai 1945 Guelma Algeria Reporter ? ? ? ?
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Malaysia Reporter ? ? ? ?
University Mohamed Boudiaf of M¡¯Sila Algeria Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of Al-Qadisiyah Iraq Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of Arizona United States Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of Brawijaya Indonesia Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of Fortaleza (UNIFOR) Brazil Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of Mauritius Mauritius Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of Mohaghegh Ardabili Iran Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of Mosul Iraq Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of Nairobi Kenya Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of Nigeria Nsukka Nigeria Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of Rhode Island United States Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of Santander Colombia Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of Sussex United Kingdom Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of the Andes, Chile Chile Reporter ? ? ? ?
University of the Andes, Venezuela Venezuela Reporter ? ? ? ?
Ural Federal University Russian Federation Reporter ? ? ? ?
Vistula University Poland Reporter ? ? ? ?
Western Global University United States Reporter ? ? ? ?

ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

We welcome your feedback: if you would like to share your insights and ideas on measuring excellence in online learning, or if you are interested in participating in future years, email onlinelearningrankings@timeshighereducation.com.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Related articles
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Sponsored
<ÁñÁ«ÊÓƵ class="pane-title"> Featured jobs
ADVERTISEMENT